MirdynePROJECT · COMPANY · PROOF
For the
record.
A clear answer, its evidence, and the criterion behind the next question. All in one place.
Find your questionTHE QUESTION
What is PRISM Alpha, and who holds the ESA project?
MIRDYNE’S ANSWER
PRISM Alpha is a signed ESA project developing a proof of concept for technology-assisted materials research. Bimo Tech is the consortium prime and holds the ESA contract. Following advice during ESA-related discussions, Mirdyne began separately in August 2026 to develop and commercialize the platform. Mirdyne is not the project's prime; its commercial work follows a separate company path.
STATUS Signed ESA project · Bimo Tech is consortium prime
Mirdyne’s position. Supporting records are reviewed with the relevant parties.
- Are you assessing the signed ESA project's proof of concept or Mirdyne's separate commercial platform?
File a requirement receipt +
A requirement is easier to act on when the criterion, evidence, gap and next step are explicit. This stays in your browser until you download it; nothing is submitted.
PUBLIC STRUCTURE / PRISM ALPHA
How the work is structured.
The signed project, Mirdyne's spin-off, and experimental services can contribute to the same technical aim. They follow distinct contractual and funding paths.
A signed ESA project within a consortium.
The prime holds the project contract and funding path.
Project delivery and ESA funding follow the consortium contract.
Started in August 2026; in Gründung in Hessen.
Product development and any investment proceed through Mirdyne separately.
Mirdyne technology rights are allocated by signed agreements; project-related IP transfer is underway.
Define the material, process, measurement, and acceptance criteria.
Experimental work is commissioned under a defined scope when needed.
A laboratory result is evidence for its measured conditions; transfer to another facility requires validation.
Technology developed for Mirdyne is already assigned to Mirdyne. Project-related IP originating under Bimo Tech is being transferred under signed, filed agreements. ESA project funding remains with the consortium contract.
PROCESS → STRUCTURE → PROPERTY
A formula does not
transfer a process.
Matching the nominal alloy composition is a starting point. To reproduce performance in another laboratory, the inputs, equipment, processing, structure and tests must be compared.
Matching composition does not guarantee matching performance.
- 01
Feedstock
Lot chemistry, particle size, shape, moisture and reuse history can change the starting material.
Lot identity and measured feedstock specification
- 02
Machine
Hardware, calibration, atmosphere and maintenance affect the energy actually delivered.
Machine state and calibration record
- 03
Process window
A nominal recipe does not capture every local thermal condition or implementation detail.
Parameters, build layout and monitoring data
- 04
Microstructure
Cooling and post-processing can alter phases, grain structure, porosity and residual stress.
Micrographs, defect analysis and heat-treatment record
- 05
Properties
A single successful coupon does not describe variation across builds, directions or sites.
Comparable test methods and property distributions
- 06
Duty cycle
Useful performance depends on the loads, environment and lifetime of the intended part.
Application-specific acceptance limits and qualification plan
Record the source conditions, repeat the build and tests at the destination, then compare the results against agreed limits. The comparison below shows why that last step matters.
Ratio of between-laboratory to within-laboratory standard deviation. A ratio of 1× would mean equal spread; bars share a 0–5× scale.
- 01 Record the source process
- 02 Repeat it at the destination
- 03 Compare against agreed limits
Transfer is demonstrated by evidence, then qualified for the intended use.
When an answer is incomplete, we name the gap. When a requirement is unclear, we ask what observable result would change the assessment.
EXAMINE PRISM ↗